QUICK LINKS          Market Commentary 9/30/19
 Quarterly Newsletter

pdf   Q3 2019

pdf   Q2 2019

pdf   Q1 2019

pdf   Q4 2018

pdf   Q3 2018

pdf   Q2 2018

pdf   Q1 2018

pdf   Q4 2017

pdf   Q3 2017

pdf   Q2 2017

pdf   Q1 2017

pdf   Q4 2016

pdf   Q3 2016

pdf   Q1 2016

pdf   Q4 2015

pdf   Q3 2015

pdf   Q2 2015

pdf   Q1 2015

pdf   Q4 2014

pdf   Q3 2014

pdf   Q2 2014

pdf   Q1 2014

pdf   Q4 2013

pdf   Q3 2013

pdf   Q2 2013

pdf   Q1 2013

pdf   Q4 2012

pdf  Q2 2012

pdf   Q1 2012

pdf   Q4 2011

pdf   Q3 2011




> Manor Fund
> Growth Fund
> Bond Fund
> Performance
> Fund Fact Sheets
> Prospectus
> Fund Information


What, Me Worry?

Those of us “of a certain age” will immediately recognize that phrase.  It is the tag line for Alfred E. Neumann, the gapped tooth mascot of MAD Magazine.  He graced the cover of almost every issue, often superimposed on celebrities or targets of the satire magazine’s articles.  MAD Magazine ceased publication of new issues recently, a victim of online media, changing demographics, and rising production costs.  The magazine survived for 67 years, published more than 550 issues, and didn’t accept advertising until 2001.  Circulation peaked at 2.1 million copies in 1974, but was down to 150,000 by the end.  It was a good run, and they left a legacy of great satire.

A satirical “What, me worry?” might be an appropriate analytical basis for the financial markets these days.  While returns were modestly positive for both the stock and bond markets this quarter, stocks pushed to new highs in July and interest rates pushed towards new lows.  From January through September 2019, stocks, as measured by the S&P 500 index, are up more that 20%, while bonds, as measured by the Bloomberg Barclay Intermediate Treasury index, were up 5.2%.  That is impressive considering just nine months ago we were at the end of a disastrous quarter that pushed stock returns into negative territory for 2018.  The move by stocks towards new highs this year is concerning, however, given valuation premiums and external risk factors.

In addition to valuation measures in the upper range of historical norms, domestic investors worried about the direction of Fed policy and slowing economic growth in the US.  After roiling the markets last year with talk about “Quantitative Tightening on autopilot” the Fed seemed to become more sensitive to market sentiment.  Responding to anecdotal indications of a slowdown in economic growth, and the inversion of the Treasury yield curve, the Fed moved to cut rates and end its Quantitative Tightening at the FOMC meeting in  August.  But in comments afterward, Chairman Powell raised uncertainty about further Fed action, contributing to a stock pullback.  Stocks rebounded when the Fed cut rates again in September and clearly signaled its intent to remain in an accommodative mode.  The need for accommodation became apparent as rates on overnight repurchase agreements (“repos”) spiked late in the quarter.  While initially blamed on heightened liquidity needs for quarterly tax payments, the dislocation in repo rates persisted, indicating unusual stress for liquidity to facilitate bank funding needs.  By quarter-end the Fed was forced to inject significant liquidity into the system in what some commentators are referring to as another round of “quantitative easing”.

On the global front, slowing growth in China and the European Union created additional uncertainty.  Growth in China clearly slowed over the past few years, compounded by trade tensions and recent decisions by several US companies to actively shift production capacity from China to the US or more favorable nations.  Growth in the European Union remains anemic, even in Germany, once the driver of EU growth.  The European Central Bank reinitiated quantitative easing as the term of Mario Draghi came to an end, but there are mounting concerns that the EU  has limited options to expand its monetary stimulus.  With interest rates already in negative territory further interest rate reductions may prove to be counter-productive.

Market moves such as we have seen this year often contribute to complacency.  Investors, relying on the Fed as a market backstop, assume additional risk in pursuit of higher yields and stock market returns.  That risk translates to higher volatility as markets become overextended at the top.  Successive rounds of liquidity injections over the past several years have contributed to concerns about the capacity and effectiveness of ongoing Fed market interventions, while the recent liquidity crisis in the repo bank funding markets underscores the potential that continued market interventions may have unintended consequences.  Over-reliance on the Fed may prove disappointing if the Fed is not ready, or able, to provide stability when markets falter.

As  the stock market rebounded late in the quarter we observed a shift in market leadership .  Since the financial crisis, a period corresponding to repeated Fed market interventions, stocks with growth characteristics have outperformed stocks with value characteristics on a consistent basis.  That relationship reversed in September, indicating the possibility that the impact of additional Fed liquidity injections may be limited.  We have always believed that valuation matters in stock selection, and sense that the markets may be turning in our direction.  We have confidence that our focus on companies with strong fundamental valuations, solid balance sheets, reasonable debt levels, and the ability to remain profitable in difficult times will be rewarded.  While we worry about the ability of the markets to continue their upward move, we believe that the consistent application of our valuation-based process provides the best guidance for investing in these uncertain markets.

Daniel A. Morris

  Download PDF



> Learn more about Morris Capital Advisors, LLC





















Privacy | Disclaimer | Directions | Contact Us | Morris Capital Advisors, LLC | 15 Chester Commons, Malvern, PA 19355 | toll-free: 800-787-3334 | fax: 610-725-8003